It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
"Yes" is not to support trump, but to re-vote him, for whatever reasons... it doesn't mean that he likes trump, it means that he dislikes the other candidate moreBut you said yes in the poll. You could have just abstained.I'm sort've in a grey area right now about Trump. I legitimately don't know enough to fear him or support him.then why do you support him?Jarr, has Donald Trump done anything that is good so far?I'm not trying to say Trump is good. I'm just asking for RiR and everybody else who complains about him without explaining why to actually give solid reasoning.@Jarr2003 here's a few things for you to think about.This is exactly what I was asking from RiR.
Nepotism. He has given important jobs to family members when they have no experience.
The erosion of science. He is putting anti-science fuckwits in charge of education (a crazy creationist) and environmental (a climate science denialist who refuses to disclose his financial connections to the oil and gas industries) agencies. Anybody who does not understand science has no place at the head of publicly funded environmental or education agencies.
The erosion of national security. Trump has fired the director of the FBI because he didn't get the result he wanted over Hillary's emails, with evidence that the sacking comes after an attempt to stifle an investigation into the connection of his choice for national security adviser with Russia.
His defence secretary once discussed how much fun it is to shoot muslims in Afghanistan.
The white house describes lies and errors as "alternative facts".
He reduced the efficacy of international aid agencies by stating they'd lose funding if the even DISCUSS abortion (let alone provide it) with women needing medical help.
Anyways, I fully agree with the anti-science points. People who are against science should never be put in power over education.
The defense secretary thing isn't that big of a deal, I think. If he is an effective general, then I don't see too much of an issue with that, so long as he gets properly regulated.
Again, I agree fully on the alternative facts thing. Hiding behind nicknames for lies is wrong. The abortion part is also bad.
You'd probably die if you tried to live off just raw milk.> Milk is never raw, some people just like it with extra fat and stuff
It wouldn't be worthless, he would definitely hide them away so that no one knows about them1. Infinite money.1: if you had infinite money , it would be worthless, because money is only worth its rarity, also, whos to say it wouldn't be in pesos or euros, or aincent coins no one will pay you with?
2. A muscular body that'll never go away.
3. A bucket of KFC chicken.