Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Please read the forum rules before posting.

Check if you are posting in the correct category.

The Off Topic section is not meant for discussing Cookie Clicker.
⚠️ The DashNet forums will be shut down on September 12th 2019.⚠️

Please see here for more information.

Place to see where I released most of my games created using Idle Game Maker

DtjiPsimfansDtjiPsimfans Posts: 211Member ✭✭
Hi everyone. If you want to see most of my games created using Idle Game Maker, go to the link below.


  • firefliesfireflies Posts: 56Member ✭✭
    you need to revisit your calculations on coder tycoon - once I got the first building, it gave me enough to buy another in seconds, and then a third in less time, and so on - the building is too efficiently self-funding and as the next buildings came out they were already self-funding too...

    Long story short, in under five minutes, I ended up with over 1k of the top buildings and reached end game with infinity of each resource per second.
  • firefliesfireflies Posts: 56Member ✭✭
    Same with your music maker - the initial purchase at 500 clicks is quite exorbitant to start but after that, the purchases just roll in.

    infinity resources per second again, under 6 minutes as per the timer.
  • firefliesfireflies Posts: 56Member ✭✭
    your water park game is missing the coins resource best I can tell - can't buy any buildings without it so the game stalls from the outset.
  • DtjiPsimfansDtjiPsimfans Posts: 211Member ✭✭
    Oh okay. Thanks for your critique @fireflies
  • DtjiPsimfansDtjiPsimfans Posts: 211Member ✭✭
    @fireflies in the water park game, coins can actually be gained under certain conditions. Code for the game is in the link below.
  • BillaboBillabo Posts: 1,324Moderator, Friendly, Conversationalist Mod
    edited November 2018
    Sorry, but what an awful system. Do you even playtest your games? It's not only possible, but VERY LIKELY that you can't gain any coins from clicking the button. Because of the following code,
    on tick:if (mCube <= 0) multiply yield of coins by 0 on tick:if (kWh <= 0) multiply yield of coins by 0 on tick:if ((visitors + workers) > emptySpace) multiply yield of coins by 0 on tick:if (visitors > workers) multiply yield of coins by 0
    When any of these conditions are true you can't gain coins:
    -If you have no mCube (so, if you've never clicked the button)
    -If you have no kWh (so, if you've never clicked the button)
    -if you have more visitors and workers combined than you have emptyspace. This is the biggest offender, because there's an equal chance of gaining visitors, workers, and emptyspace. Statistically, you're going to have about equal numbers of those three things, which means visitors + workers will be about double your emptyspace.
    -if you have more visitors than workers (so, about 50% of the time)

    I don't know what mechanic you were going for with that, but you need to remove that code I quoted for your game to be functional at all.

    Maybe you meant for the clickable to be unaffected by those conditions? That's the only way I can see them being somewhat reasonable. If so, you need to remove that code, and instead add code to each building so that it only yields if none of those conditions are true.

    Edit: FYI, I wiped my save 5 times before I was able to gain coins from clicking the button, and even then, I gained a whole 100 coins (a SINGLE click) before I met the visitors + workers > emptyspace condition, locking me out.
    Fire Emblem: Fates castle address
  • DtjiPsimfansDtjiPsimfans Posts: 211Member ✭✭
    Oh. I’ve play tested and I found it possible but challenging to get coins.
  • DtjiPsimfansDtjiPsimfans Posts: 211Member ✭✭
    @Billabo for my games (including my future games), I agree that giving those conditions make the game awful.
  • DtjiPsimfansDtjiPsimfans Posts: 211Member ✭✭
    edited November 2018
    @Billabo I really want the clickable to be unaffected by those conditions but the buildings to stop yielding coins when any of those conditions are true for that game.
  • BillaboBillabo Posts: 1,324Moderator, Friendly, Conversationalist Mod
    I was probably a bit harsh there, but it seems like you're churning out games without putting a lot of effort into making them good.

    Anyway, so to put the conditions on buildings only, I think inserting this code into each building would work:
    on tick: if (mCube <= 0) yield 0 coins else if (kWh <= 0) yield 0 coins else if ((visitors + workers) > emptySpace) yield 0 coins else if (visitors > workers) yield 0 coins else [insert the building's yields here] end end
    Fire Emblem: Fates castle address
  • DtjiPsimfansDtjiPsimfans Posts: 211Member ✭✭
    @Billabo Oh okay. Thank you.
  • EricBolton1993EricBolton1993 Posts: 484Member ✭✭✭
    edited November 2018
    @Billabo thats why my updates take so long to come out got to take your time and make it good!
    But DtjiPsimfans it doesn't hurt to have a Beta for people to test out before you go live with the updates! With my GCR Game, I go as far as Code my Game in Alpha for just me, then release to Beta for people, then live after everything is good :)

    Also This game has promise :)
  • YosukeHanamuraYosukeHanamura Posts: 986Member, Helpful ✭✭
    I see your games are becoming better. However, i feel like you must stop releasing so much games, and update them a lot. That will bring the ppl.
    In modern physics, antimatter is defined as a material composed of the antiparticle (or "partners") to the corresponding particles of ordinary matter.

    In theory, a particle and its anti-particle have the same mass as one another, but opposite electric charge, and other differences in quantum numbers. For example, a proton has positive charge while an antiproton has negative charge. A collision between any particle and its anti-particle partner is known to lead to their mutual annihilation, giving rise to various proportions of intense photons (gamma rays), neutrinos, and sometimes less-massive particle–antiparticle pairs.

    Annihilation usually results in a release of energy that becomes available for heat or work. The amount of the released energy is usually proportional to the total mass of the collided matter and antimatter, in accord with the mass–energy equivalence equation, E = mc2.

    Antimatter particles bind with one another to form antimatter, just as ordinary particles bind to form normal matter. For example, a positron (the antiparticle of the electron) and an antiproton (the antiparticle of the proton) can form an antihydrogen atom. Physical principles indicate that complex antimatter atomic nuclei are possible, as well as anti-atoms corresponding to the known chemical elements.

    There is considerable speculation as to why the observable universe is composed almost entirely of ordinary matter, as opposed to an equal mixture of matter and antimatter. This asymmetry of matter and antimatter in the visible universe is one of the great unsolved problems in physics. The process by which this inequality between matter and antimatter particles developed is called baryogenesis.

    Antimatter in the form of anti-atoms is one of the most difficult materials to produce. Individual antimatter particles, however, are commonly produced by particle accelerators and in some types of radioactive decay. The nuclei of antihelium have been artificially produced with difficulty. These are the most complex anti-nuclei so far observed.

    Formally, antimatter particles can be defined by their negative baryon number or lepton number, while "normal" (non-antimatter) matter particles have a positive baryon or lepton number. These two classes of particles are the antiparticle partners of one another.

    The idea of negative matter appears in past theories of matter that have now been abandoned. Using the once popular vortex theory of gravity, the possibility of matter with negative gravity was discussed by William Hicks in the 1880s. Between the 1880s and the 1890s, Karl Pearson proposed the existence of "squirts" and sinks of the flow of aether. The squirts represented normal matter and the sinks represented negative matter. Pearson's theory required a fourth dimension for the aether to flow from and into.

    The term antimatter was first used by Arthur Schuster in two rather whimsical letters to Nature in 1898, in which he coined the term. He hypothesized antiatoms, as well as whole antimatter solar systems, and discussed the possibility of matter and antimatter annihilating each other. Schuster's ideas were not a serious theoretical proposal, merely speculation, and like the previous ideas, differed from the modern concept of antimatter in that it possessed negative gravity.

    The modern theory of antimatter began in 1928, with a paper by Paul Dirac. Dirac realised that his relativistic version of the Schrödinger wave equation for electrons predicted the possibility of antielectrons. These were discovered by Carl D. Anderson in 1932 and named positrons (a portmanteau of "positive electron"). Although Dirac did not himself use the term antimatter, its use follows on naturally enough from antielectrons, antiprotons, etc. A complete periodic table of antimatter was envisaged by Charles Janet in 1929.

    The Feynman–Stueckelberg interpretation states that antimatter and antiparticles are regular particles traveling backward in time.

    There are compelling theoretical reasons to believe that, aside from the fact that antiparticles have different signs on all charges (such as electric charge and spin), matter and antimatter have exactly the same properties. This means a particle and its corresponding antiparticle must have identical masses and decay lifetimes (if unstable). It also implies that, for example, a star made up of antimatter (an "antistar") will shine just like an ordinary star. This idea was tested experimentally in 2016 by the ALPHA experiment, which measured the transition between the two lowest energy states of antihydrogen. The results, which are identical to that of hydrogen, confirmed the validity of quantum mechanics for antimatter.

    Positrons were reported in November 2008 to have been generated by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in larger numbers than by any previous synthetic process. A laser drove electrons through a gold target's nuclei, which caused the incoming electrons to emit energy quanta that decayed into both matter and antimatter. Positrons were detected at a higher rate and in greater density than ever previously detected in a laboratory. Previous experiments made smaller quantities of positrons using lasers and paper-thin targets; however, new simulations showed that short, ultra-intense lasers and millimeter-thick gold are a far more effective source.

    Antimatter cannot be stored in a container made of ordinary matter because antimatter reacts with any matter it touches, annihilating itself and an equal amount of the container. Antimatter in the form of charged particles can be contained by a combination of electric and magnetic fields, in a device called a Penning trap. This device cannot, however, contain antimatter that consists of uncharged particles, for which atomic traps are used. In particular, such a trap may use the dipole moment (electric or magnetic) of the trapped particles. At high vacuum, the matter or antimatter particles can be trapped and cooled with slightly off-resonant laser radiation using a magneto-optical trap or magnetic trap. Small particles can also be suspended with optical tweezers, using a highly focused laser beam.

    In 2011, CERN scientists were able to preserve antihydrogen for approximately 17 minutes.

    Scientists claim that antimatter is the costliest material to make. In 2006, Gerald Smith estimated $250 million could produce 10 milligrams of positrons (equivalent to $25 billion per gram); in 1999, NASA gave a figure of $62.5 trillion per gram of antihydrogen. This is because production is difficult (only very few antiprotons are produced in reactions in particle accelerators), and because there is higher demand for other uses of particle accelerators. According to CERN, it has cost a few hundred million Swiss francs to produce about 1 billionth of a gram (the amount used so far for particle/antiparticle collisions). In comparison, to produce the first atomic weapon, the cost of the Manhattan Project was estimated at $23 billion with inflation during 2007.

    Several studies funded by the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts are exploring whether it might be possible to use magnetic scoops to collect the antimatter that occurs naturally in the Van Allen belt of the Earth, and ultimately, the belts of gas giants, like Jupiter, hopefully at a lower cost per gram.

    Matter–antimatter reactions have practical applications in medical imaging, such as positron emission tomography (PET). In positive beta decay, a nuclide loses surplus positive charge by emitting a positron (in the same event, a proton becomes a neutron, and a neutrino is also emitted). Nuclides with surplus positive charge are easily made in a cyclotron and are widely generated for medical use. Antiprotons have also been shown within laboratory experiments to have the potential to treat certain cancers, in a similar method currently used for ion (proton) therapy.

    Antimatter has been considered as a trigger mechanism for nuclear weapons. A major obstacle is the difficulty of producing antimatter in large enough quantities, and there is no evidence that it will ever be feasible. However, the U.S. Air Force funded studies of the physics of antimatter in the Cold War, and began considering its possible use in weapons, not just as a trigger, but as the explosive itself.
  • DtjiPsimfansDtjiPsimfans Posts: 211Member ✭✭
    @YosukeHanamura thanks for your appreciation.
  • DtjiPsimfansDtjiPsimfans Posts: 211Member ✭✭
    To be honest, I’m currently working on a new game with Idle Game Maker with more Buildings. This game will be more complex than the previous ones.
  • DtjiPsimfansDtjiPsimfans Posts: 211Member ✭✭
    The current progress of the game I’m currently working on is in the link below. There are still many things to add to make the game complex. Since the game is complex, using GitHub will be more reasonable than using Pastebin since GitHub can store files with more than 512 kilobytes.
Sign In or Register to comment.