Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Please read the forum rules before posting.



Check if you are posting in the correct category.



The Off Topic section is not meant for discussing Cookie Clicker.

Destroy the forest!

123468

Comments

  • LefianLefian Member Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭

    Lefians Entity needs to be summoned!
    5/8

    Thanks for the hlap :DD
    6/98
    mmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmm
  • ManiklasManiklas Member Posts: 2,289 ✭✭✭
    2/?
    things are beginning to change around me, noone knows what the hell is happening
    Is god a cookie, or is the cookie a god?
    The world may never know
    "You have now, officially broken the game,"-Maniklas
    "Okay, ANYWAY, yes, I am a magician,"-RunninginReverse
    """"My game will be playable on all Samsung Microwaves with firmware update 5.3.2 and up." - Audiot" - RunningInReverse" - Purge" - Agubhagu
    Adopt one today! Adopt one today!
  • ScribbliumScribblium Member Posts: 417 ✭✭
    edited February 12

    call a spaceship to crash into the shards

    -100000 HP

    put a magic spell on shards, so they are stronger

    ARE YOU MISSING THE GOD DAMN POINT?!?

    place large amounts of explosives around the forest and shards.

    (2/4)
    TLGa2007 said:

    step 3: need more workers

    iceklaus said:

    analyse shards structure to enhance lava's explosives, add precision timers to them to enhance even more.

    Lefians Entity needs to be summoned!
    5/8

    Lefian said:

    Lefians Entity needs to be summoned!
    5/8

    Thanks for the hlap :DD
    6/98
    Maniklas said:

    2/?
    things are beginning to change around me, noone knows what the hell is happening


    -120 DPT (12 Drones)
    -125 DPT (5 Missile Drones)
    -(20 + 18) DPT (Poison)
    -10 DPT (Woody)
    -20 DPT (Military Base)
    (283 DPT)

    Forest's HP: 601,145/1,000,000
    Forest spawned Shards! Any human or animal attacks will be canceled out until the Shards are destroyed.
    Shards' HP: 897,617/1,000,000

    Relationship Status: 30i (Imaginary)
  • TLGa2007TLGa2007 Member Posts: 110 ✭✭
  • iceklausiceklaus Member Posts: 370 ✭✭
    ultrasonic blast cannon at shards
    the ones who dare have lives woth dying for
  • SirfishSirfish Member Posts: 1,299 ✭✭✭
    why is my damage per turn being ignored/strikethroughed?

    I make a big hammer to smash the crystals
    1/2
    I'm just here to do stuff and play games because I am unproductive and should learn how to do something with my life but instead i'm just going be here and do nothing
  • QuentinPlaysMCQuentinPlaysMC Member Posts: 714 ✭✭✭
    take the rubble from the spaceship and turn it into kinetic weaponry, and shoot it at the shards.
    why are you here? why am I here? were we created in the same way that we created them?
  • Lava_EntityLava_Entity Member Posts: 2,008 ✭✭✭
    lace the forest with wire that detonates when activated

    (3/4)
    cease your tomfoolery

  • LefianLefian Member Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭
    7/8
    mmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmm
  • BonkersTheBucketBonkersTheBucket Member Posts: 94 ✭✭
    Lefians entity is now complete!
    8/8!
    Hehehe, this will be good attack.
    the one who gives AI inspiration
  • LefianLefian Member Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭

    Lefians entity is now complete!
    8/8!
    Hehehe, this will be good attack.

    L'high five
    mmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmm
  • ScribbliumScribblium Member Posts: 417 ✭✭
    edited February 15
    iceklaus said:

    ultrasonic blast cannon at shards

    -100000 HP

    take the rubble from the spaceship and turn it into kinetic weaponry, and shoot it at the shards.

    -50000 HP
    TLGa2007 said:

    step 4: buy the MOAR metals for building and waiting.

    Sirfish said:

    why is my damage per turn being ignored/strikethroughed?

    I make a big hammer to smash the crystals
    1/2

    Because they use humans/animals
    Lefian said:

    7/8

    Lefians entity is now complete!
    8/8!
    Hehehe, this will be good attack.

    Lefian said:

    Lefians entity is now complete!
    8/8!
    Hehehe, this will be good attack.

    L'high five
    -130 DPT (13 Drones)
    -150 DPT (6 Missile Drones)
    -(20 + 20) DPT (Poison)
    -10 DPT (Woody)
    -20 DPT (Military Base)
    (320 DPT)

    Forest's HP: 600,800/1,000,000
    Forest spawned Shards! Any human or animal attacks will be canceled out until the Shards are destroyed.
    Shards' HP: 647,617/1,000,000
    Post edited by Scribblium on
    Relationship Status: 30i (Imaginary)
  • ManiklasManiklas Member Posts: 2,289 ✭✭✭
    3/???
    Is god a cookie, or is the cookie a god?
    The world may never know
    "You have now, officially broken the game,"-Maniklas
    "Okay, ANYWAY, yes, I am a magician,"-RunninginReverse
    """"My game will be playable on all Samsung Microwaves with firmware update 5.3.2 and up." - Audiot" - RunningInReverse" - Purge" - Agubhagu
    Adopt one today! Adopt one today!
  • iceklausiceklaus Member Posts: 370 ✭✭
    edited February 13
    start assembling 60 siege tanks platoon 1/2



    PS1: don't forget the treeluminati once the shards are out
    PS2: oh yeah, those shards will be down
    the ones who dare have lives woth dying for
  • SirfishSirfish Member Posts: 1,299 ✭✭✭
    2/2 hammer time, hammer smashes shards
    I'm just here to do stuff and play games because I am unproductive and should learn how to do something with my life but instead i'm just going be here and do nothing
  • QuentinPlaysMCQuentinPlaysMC Member Posts: 714 ✭✭✭
    cronch the shards
    why are you here? why am I here? were we created in the same way that we created them?
  • Lava_EntityLava_Entity Member Posts: 2,008 ✭✭✭
    skLat the shards
    cease your tomfoolery

  • BonkersTheBucketBonkersTheBucket Member Posts: 94 ✭✭
    Shards make me sad! I throw a lego at it.
    Then I get my blob realm blobs to throw their legos at it.
    the one who gives AI inspiration
  • ManiklasManiklas Member Posts: 2,289 ✭✭✭
    Change class: charger

    Start double charging

    Summoning SCP-001(2,5/???)

    Create a charge (0,5/1)
    Is god a cookie, or is the cookie a god?
    The world may never know
    "You have now, officially broken the game,"-Maniklas
    "Okay, ANYWAY, yes, I am a magician,"-RunninginReverse
    """"My game will be playable on all Samsung Microwaves with firmware update 5.3.2 and up." - Audiot" - RunningInReverse" - Purge" - Agubhagu
    Adopt one today! Adopt one today!
  • ScribbliumScribblium Member Posts: 417 ✭✭
    edited February 16
    Sirfish said:

    2/2 hammer time, hammer smashes shards

    -1000 HP

    skLat the shards

    +1/12 HP

    Shards make me sad! I throw a lego at it.
    Then I get my blob realm blobs to throw their legos at it.

    -100000 HP because Blobs
    Maniklas said:

    3/???

    TLGa2007 said:

    step 5: open the building
    (build the drone)

    iceklaus said:

    start assembling 60 siege tanks platoon 1/2



    PS1: don't forget the treeluminati once the shards are out
    PS2: oh yeah, those shards will be down

    Maniklas said:

    Change class: charger

    Start double charging

    Summoning SCP-001(2,5/???)

    Create a charge (0,5/1)


    -140 DPT (13 Drones)
    -150 DPT (6 Missile Drones)
    -(20 + 22) DPT (Poison)
    -10 DPT (Woody)
    -20 DPT (Military Base)
    (320 DPT)

    Forest's HP: 600,753/1,000,000
    Forest spawned Shards! Any human or animal attacks will be canceled out until the Shards are destroyed.
    Shards' HP: 546,617.08334/1,000,000
    Post edited by Scribblium on
    Relationship Status: 30i (Imaginary)
  • YosukeHanamuraYosukeHanamura Member Posts: 344 ✭✭

    put a magic spell on shards, so they are stronger

    ARE YOU MISSING THE GOD DAMN POINT?!?

    place large amounts of explosives around the forest and shards.

    (2/4)
    what do you mean?
    In modern physics, antimatter is defined as a material composed of the antiparticle (or "partners") to the corresponding particles of ordinary matter.

    In theory, a particle and its anti-particle have the same mass as one another, but opposite electric charge, and other differences in quantum numbers. For example, a proton has positive charge while an antiproton has negative charge. A collision between any particle and its anti-particle partner is known to lead to their mutual annihilation, giving rise to various proportions of intense photons (gamma rays), neutrinos, and sometimes less-massive particle–antiparticle pairs.

    Annihilation usually results in a release of energy that becomes available for heat or work. The amount of the released energy is usually proportional to the total mass of the collided matter and antimatter, in accord with the mass–energy equivalence equation, E = mc2.

    Antimatter particles bind with one another to form antimatter, just as ordinary particles bind to form normal matter. For example, a positron (the antiparticle of the electron) and an antiproton (the antiparticle of the proton) can form an antihydrogen atom. Physical principles indicate that complex antimatter atomic nuclei are possible, as well as anti-atoms corresponding to the known chemical elements.

    There is considerable speculation as to why the observable universe is composed almost entirely of ordinary matter, as opposed to an equal mixture of matter and antimatter. This asymmetry of matter and antimatter in the visible universe is one of the great unsolved problems in physics. The process by which this inequality between matter and antimatter particles developed is called baryogenesis.

    Antimatter in the form of anti-atoms is one of the most difficult materials to produce. Individual antimatter particles, however, are commonly produced by particle accelerators and in some types of radioactive decay. The nuclei of antihelium have been artificially produced with difficulty. These are the most complex anti-nuclei so far observed.

    Formally, antimatter particles can be defined by their negative baryon number or lepton number, while "normal" (non-antimatter) matter particles have a positive baryon or lepton number. These two classes of particles are the antiparticle partners of one another.

    The idea of negative matter appears in past theories of matter that have now been abandoned. Using the once popular vortex theory of gravity, the possibility of matter with negative gravity was discussed by William Hicks in the 1880s. Between the 1880s and the 1890s, Karl Pearson proposed the existence of "squirts" and sinks of the flow of aether. The squirts represented normal matter and the sinks represented negative matter. Pearson's theory required a fourth dimension for the aether to flow from and into.

    The term antimatter was first used by Arthur Schuster in two rather whimsical letters to Nature in 1898, in which he coined the term. He hypothesized antiatoms, as well as whole antimatter solar systems, and discussed the possibility of matter and antimatter annihilating each other. Schuster's ideas were not a serious theoretical proposal, merely speculation, and like the previous ideas, differed from the modern concept of antimatter in that it possessed negative gravity.

    The modern theory of antimatter began in 1928, with a paper by Paul Dirac. Dirac realised that his relativistic version of the Schrödinger wave equation for electrons predicted the possibility of antielectrons. These were discovered by Carl D. Anderson in 1932 and named positrons (a portmanteau of "positive electron"). Although Dirac did not himself use the term antimatter, its use follows on naturally enough from antielectrons, antiprotons, etc. A complete periodic table of antimatter was envisaged by Charles Janet in 1929.

    The Feynman–Stueckelberg interpretation states that antimatter and antiparticles are regular particles traveling backward in time.

    There are compelling theoretical reasons to believe that, aside from the fact that antiparticles have different signs on all charges (such as electric charge and spin), matter and antimatter have exactly the same properties. This means a particle and its corresponding antiparticle must have identical masses and decay lifetimes (if unstable). It also implies that, for example, a star made up of antimatter (an "antistar") will shine just like an ordinary star. This idea was tested experimentally in 2016 by the ALPHA experiment, which measured the transition between the two lowest energy states of antihydrogen. The results, which are identical to that of hydrogen, confirmed the validity of quantum mechanics for antimatter.

    Positrons were reported in November 2008 to have been generated by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in larger numbers than by any previous synthetic process. A laser drove electrons through a gold target's nuclei, which caused the incoming electrons to emit energy quanta that decayed into both matter and antimatter. Positrons were detected at a higher rate and in greater density than ever previously detected in a laboratory. Previous experiments made smaller quantities of positrons using lasers and paper-thin targets; however, new simulations showed that short, ultra-intense lasers and millimeter-thick gold are a far more effective source.

    Antimatter cannot be stored in a container made of ordinary matter because antimatter reacts with any matter it touches, annihilating itself and an equal amount of the container. Antimatter in the form of charged particles can be contained by a combination of electric and magnetic fields, in a device called a Penning trap. This device cannot, however, contain antimatter that consists of uncharged particles, for which atomic traps are used. In particular, such a trap may use the dipole moment (electric or magnetic) of the trapped particles. At high vacuum, the matter or antimatter particles can be trapped and cooled with slightly off-resonant laser radiation using a magneto-optical trap or magnetic trap. Small particles can also be suspended with optical tweezers, using a highly focused laser beam.

    In 2011, CERN scientists were able to preserve antihydrogen for approximately 17 minutes.

    Scientists claim that antimatter is the costliest material to make. In 2006, Gerald Smith estimated $250 million could produce 10 milligrams of positrons (equivalent to $25 billion per gram); in 1999, NASA gave a figure of $62.5 trillion per gram of antihydrogen. This is because production is difficult (only very few antiprotons are produced in reactions in particle accelerators), and because there is higher demand for other uses of particle accelerators. According to CERN, it has cost a few hundred million Swiss francs to produce about 1 billionth of a gram (the amount used so far for particle/antiparticle collisions). In comparison, to produce the first atomic weapon, the cost of the Manhattan Project was estimated at $23 billion with inflation during 2007.

    Several studies funded by the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts are exploring whether it might be possible to use magnetic scoops to collect the antimatter that occurs naturally in the Van Allen belt of the Earth, and ultimately, the belts of gas giants, like Jupiter, hopefully at a lower cost per gram.

    Matter–antimatter reactions have practical applications in medical imaging, such as positron emission tomography (PET). In positive beta decay, a nuclide loses surplus positive charge by emitting a positron (in the same event, a proton becomes a neutron, and a neutrino is also emitted). Nuclides with surplus positive charge are easily made in a cyclotron and are widely generated for medical use. Antiprotons have also been shown within laboratory experiments to have the potential to treat certain cancers, in a similar method currently used for ion (proton) therapy.

    Antimatter has been considered as a trigger mechanism for nuclear weapons. A major obstacle is the difficulty of producing antimatter in large enough quantities, and there is no evidence that it will ever be feasible. However, the U.S. Air Force funded studies of the physics of antimatter in the Cold War, and began considering its possible use in weapons, not just as a trigger, but as the explosive itself.
  • YosukeHanamuraYosukeHanamura Member Posts: 344 ✭✭
    btw, i put another magic spell to shards, to further enhance them
    In modern physics, antimatter is defined as a material composed of the antiparticle (or "partners") to the corresponding particles of ordinary matter.

    In theory, a particle and its anti-particle have the same mass as one another, but opposite electric charge, and other differences in quantum numbers. For example, a proton has positive charge while an antiproton has negative charge. A collision between any particle and its anti-particle partner is known to lead to their mutual annihilation, giving rise to various proportions of intense photons (gamma rays), neutrinos, and sometimes less-massive particle–antiparticle pairs.

    Annihilation usually results in a release of energy that becomes available for heat or work. The amount of the released energy is usually proportional to the total mass of the collided matter and antimatter, in accord with the mass–energy equivalence equation, E = mc2.

    Antimatter particles bind with one another to form antimatter, just as ordinary particles bind to form normal matter. For example, a positron (the antiparticle of the electron) and an antiproton (the antiparticle of the proton) can form an antihydrogen atom. Physical principles indicate that complex antimatter atomic nuclei are possible, as well as anti-atoms corresponding to the known chemical elements.

    There is considerable speculation as to why the observable universe is composed almost entirely of ordinary matter, as opposed to an equal mixture of matter and antimatter. This asymmetry of matter and antimatter in the visible universe is one of the great unsolved problems in physics. The process by which this inequality between matter and antimatter particles developed is called baryogenesis.

    Antimatter in the form of anti-atoms is one of the most difficult materials to produce. Individual antimatter particles, however, are commonly produced by particle accelerators and in some types of radioactive decay. The nuclei of antihelium have been artificially produced with difficulty. These are the most complex anti-nuclei so far observed.

    Formally, antimatter particles can be defined by their negative baryon number or lepton number, while "normal" (non-antimatter) matter particles have a positive baryon or lepton number. These two classes of particles are the antiparticle partners of one another.

    The idea of negative matter appears in past theories of matter that have now been abandoned. Using the once popular vortex theory of gravity, the possibility of matter with negative gravity was discussed by William Hicks in the 1880s. Between the 1880s and the 1890s, Karl Pearson proposed the existence of "squirts" and sinks of the flow of aether. The squirts represented normal matter and the sinks represented negative matter. Pearson's theory required a fourth dimension for the aether to flow from and into.

    The term antimatter was first used by Arthur Schuster in two rather whimsical letters to Nature in 1898, in which he coined the term. He hypothesized antiatoms, as well as whole antimatter solar systems, and discussed the possibility of matter and antimatter annihilating each other. Schuster's ideas were not a serious theoretical proposal, merely speculation, and like the previous ideas, differed from the modern concept of antimatter in that it possessed negative gravity.

    The modern theory of antimatter began in 1928, with a paper by Paul Dirac. Dirac realised that his relativistic version of the Schrödinger wave equation for electrons predicted the possibility of antielectrons. These were discovered by Carl D. Anderson in 1932 and named positrons (a portmanteau of "positive electron"). Although Dirac did not himself use the term antimatter, its use follows on naturally enough from antielectrons, antiprotons, etc. A complete periodic table of antimatter was envisaged by Charles Janet in 1929.

    The Feynman–Stueckelberg interpretation states that antimatter and antiparticles are regular particles traveling backward in time.

    There are compelling theoretical reasons to believe that, aside from the fact that antiparticles have different signs on all charges (such as electric charge and spin), matter and antimatter have exactly the same properties. This means a particle and its corresponding antiparticle must have identical masses and decay lifetimes (if unstable). It also implies that, for example, a star made up of antimatter (an "antistar") will shine just like an ordinary star. This idea was tested experimentally in 2016 by the ALPHA experiment, which measured the transition between the two lowest energy states of antihydrogen. The results, which are identical to that of hydrogen, confirmed the validity of quantum mechanics for antimatter.

    Positrons were reported in November 2008 to have been generated by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in larger numbers than by any previous synthetic process. A laser drove electrons through a gold target's nuclei, which caused the incoming electrons to emit energy quanta that decayed into both matter and antimatter. Positrons were detected at a higher rate and in greater density than ever previously detected in a laboratory. Previous experiments made smaller quantities of positrons using lasers and paper-thin targets; however, new simulations showed that short, ultra-intense lasers and millimeter-thick gold are a far more effective source.

    Antimatter cannot be stored in a container made of ordinary matter because antimatter reacts with any matter it touches, annihilating itself and an equal amount of the container. Antimatter in the form of charged particles can be contained by a combination of electric and magnetic fields, in a device called a Penning trap. This device cannot, however, contain antimatter that consists of uncharged particles, for which atomic traps are used. In particular, such a trap may use the dipole moment (electric or magnetic) of the trapped particles. At high vacuum, the matter or antimatter particles can be trapped and cooled with slightly off-resonant laser radiation using a magneto-optical trap or magnetic trap. Small particles can also be suspended with optical tweezers, using a highly focused laser beam.

    In 2011, CERN scientists were able to preserve antihydrogen for approximately 17 minutes.

    Scientists claim that antimatter is the costliest material to make. In 2006, Gerald Smith estimated $250 million could produce 10 milligrams of positrons (equivalent to $25 billion per gram); in 1999, NASA gave a figure of $62.5 trillion per gram of antihydrogen. This is because production is difficult (only very few antiprotons are produced in reactions in particle accelerators), and because there is higher demand for other uses of particle accelerators. According to CERN, it has cost a few hundred million Swiss francs to produce about 1 billionth of a gram (the amount used so far for particle/antiparticle collisions). In comparison, to produce the first atomic weapon, the cost of the Manhattan Project was estimated at $23 billion with inflation during 2007.

    Several studies funded by the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts are exploring whether it might be possible to use magnetic scoops to collect the antimatter that occurs naturally in the Van Allen belt of the Earth, and ultimately, the belts of gas giants, like Jupiter, hopefully at a lower cost per gram.

    Matter–antimatter reactions have practical applications in medical imaging, such as positron emission tomography (PET). In positive beta decay, a nuclide loses surplus positive charge by emitting a positron (in the same event, a proton becomes a neutron, and a neutrino is also emitted). Nuclides with surplus positive charge are easily made in a cyclotron and are widely generated for medical use. Antiprotons have also been shown within laboratory experiments to have the potential to treat certain cancers, in a similar method currently used for ion (proton) therapy.

    Antimatter has been considered as a trigger mechanism for nuclear weapons. A major obstacle is the difficulty of producing antimatter in large enough quantities, and there is no evidence that it will ever be feasible. However, the U.S. Air Force funded studies of the physics of antimatter in the Cold War, and began considering its possible use in weapons, not just as a trigger, but as the explosive itself.
  • iceklausiceklaus Member Posts: 370 ✭✭
    edited February 15
    60 siege tanks produced, they are all autonomously programmed. 2/2

    lay siege to the wretched shards!


    the ones who dare have lives woth dying for
  • QuentinPlaysMCQuentinPlaysMC Member Posts: 714 ✭✭✭
    stab the shards angrily bc the cronch didn't work
    why are you here? why am I here? were we created in the same way that we created them?
  • SirfishSirfish Member Posts: 1,299 ✭✭✭
    I build a battery to help me charge at a later date 1/2
    I'm just here to do stuff and play games because I am unproductive and should learn how to do something with my life but instead i'm just going be here and do nothing
  • BonkersTheBucketBonkersTheBucket Member Posts: 94 ✭✭

    put a magic spell on shards, so they are stronger

    ARE YOU MISSING THE GOD DAMN POINT?!?

    place large amounts of explosives around the forest and shards.

    (2/4)
    what do you mean?
    I think he means that you are suppose to hurt the forest and you aren't doing it. But you've stated that you are helping the it and Lava might not know it.


    I take part of a shard and throw it at another shard. Then do it again. . . and again. . . and again. . . and again. . . and again.
    the one who gives AI inspiration
  • ScribbliumScribblium Member Posts: 417 ✭✭
    edited February 17

    btw, i put another magic spell to shards, to further enhance them

    iceklaus said:

    60 siege tanks produced, they are all autonomously programmed. 2/2

    lay siege to the wretched shards!


    -100 HP lingering for next 10 turns

    stab the shards angrily bc the cronch didn't work

    -100 HP

    put a magic spell on shards, so they are stronger

    ARE YOU MISSING THE GOD DAMN POINT?!?

    place large amounts of explosives around the forest and shards.

    (2/4)
    what do you mean?
    I think he means that you are suppose to hurt the forest and you aren't doing it. But you've stated that you are helping the it and Lava might not know it.


    I take part of a shard and throw it at another shard. Then do it again. . . and again. . . and again. . . and again. . . and again.
    -1000 HP
    TLGa2007 said:

    need some time to make a new 4 drones
    1/3

    Sirfish said:

    I build a battery to help me charge at a later date 1/2


    -150 DPT (15 Drones)
    -175 DPT (7 Missile Drones)
    -(20 + 24) DPT (Poison)
    -10 DPT (Woody)
    -20 DPT (Military Base)
    -100 DPT (Siege Tanks) (1/10)

    (469 DPT)

    Forest's HP: 600,374/1,000,000
    Forest spawned Shards! Any human or animal attacks will be canceled out until the Shards are destroyed.
    Shards' HP: 645,517.08334/1,000,000
    Post edited by Scribblium on
    Relationship Status: 30i (Imaginary)
  • iceklausiceklaus Member Posts: 370 ✭✭
    wait, weren't the siege tanks 100 dpt?
    and I aimed (tried) at the shards.

    me + rocks + trebuchet = love
    trebuchet the shards
    the ones who dare have lives woth dying for
Sign In or Register to comment.